In the world of cinema, where success stories often dominate the narrative, it's intriguing to delve into the lesser-told tales of cinematic flops and their aftermath. This is precisely what David Kittredge's documentary, 'Boorman and the Devil', sets out to do, offering a unique perspective on the making and unmaking of 'Exorcist II: The Heretic'.
The film industry is no stranger to failures, but what makes this documentary particularly captivating is its focus on a director who, despite a long and celebrated career, experienced a massive flop with this sequel. John Boorman, an open and engaging participant in the documentary, provides an honest and humble insight into his journey with 'Exorcist II'.
The Making of a Flop
One might assume that flops are often the result of studio interference or an indifferent market, but Boorman's case is different. He had the creative freedom and resources most directors dream of - a substantial budget, final cut privileges, and a supportive studio. So, what went wrong?
A Director's Misstep
Boorman's approach to the sequel was unique, to say the least. He didn't like the original 'The Exorcist' and aimed to create a riposte, a film that celebrated the power of good over evil. However, as he admits, this was a misjudgment. Audiences in 1977 were not looking for a feel-good story after the intense and iconic original. It was a bold move that backfired spectacularly.
The Impact of Failure
The failure of 'Exorcist II' had a profound effect on Boorman. It sent him into a creative tailspin, and in a panic, he made a drastic decision - he re-edited the film, creating a new version for international audiences, a move he later regretted. This highlights the psychological toll that failure can have on even the most experienced filmmakers.
Analyzing the Flaws
Boorman is remarkably self-aware and open about his role in the film's failure. He takes responsibility, acknowledging that he didn't understand or care about the audience's expectations for such a film. His creative choices, influenced by Rospo Pallenberg, were ambitious but ultimately disastrous. From the tap-dancing scenes to the sleep-inducing 'synchronizer' sequences, it's clear that the film's perceived flaws can be traced back to the director's vision.
A Different Perspective
Interestingly, not everyone in the documentary shares the negative sentiment. Mike Flanagan, director of an upcoming 'Exorcist' movie, appreciates the film's merits, praising the cinematography and score. This divergent viewpoint adds a layer of complexity to the discussion, suggesting that even failures can have redeeming qualities.
A Thoughtful Conclusion
'Boorman and the Devil' is a fascinating exploration of the delicate balance between artistic vision and audience expectations. It reminds us that even the most celebrated filmmakers can stumble, and that sometimes, the most interesting stories are those of failure. As a personal reflection, I'd argue that while commercial success is important, it's the bold and unique failures that often leave a more lasting impression, and in that sense, 'Exorcist II' has its place in cinematic history.
